Search for Shangri-LA

With Donald Trump's recent announcement to end the DACA programme, immigration has once again become the political hot topic. Not that it was ever far away from being so, after all, building a border wall and putting 'American first' were signatures of his campaign. Across the pond, immigration hysteria was one of the key factors in prompting the referendum and Brexit. As a British citizen, I know first hand of the great services immigrants provide to our country for huge institutions such as the National Health Service (NHS). Their contribution to maintaining this, despite the Conservative partie's apparent determination to privatize, is invaluable. Likewise, immigrant workers in the US are huge contributors to the American workforce, economy and GDP. I don't believe there is really much of an argument for people crossing borders to simply try and scrape by on benefits, foodstamps and welfare. I believe that the vast majority of people anywhere are willing to work and to create a better life for themselves and their family. This is why I find it immoral for the President to suggest that people who arrived in American as children, brought in by their parents, should be deported; as they, raised as Americans, have every right to follow pursue dreams in America too. This does not negate the fact that immigration remains an issue, as both the UK and the USA remain among the best countries to live in the modern world due to their living standards, tolerance, freedom of speech etc.; their is a large amount of people who would like to reside there. However, as we have seen, an uncontrolled influx of people into a country which has finite amount of jobs and housing can cause problems. If there are far too many people in competition for a smaller number of jobs, the wages will inevitably be driven down and this has a negative effect on everybody living there. In the US, this includes immigrants who are already living there. Whether or not these people arrived legally or illegally, or whether or not they have legitimate citizenship seems to be besides the point. Everybody living and working in America today would be affected by the arrival of large numbers of people looking to compete in the job market. This brings us back around to the point, immigration in the modern world in which the national population is so vast is an issue, certain countries provide better opportunities and this promotes a desire for people to move there. In an ideal world everybody could be accomodated or every country would be equal enough to balance the issue. This is not the case and it would seem unrealistic at this stage to think the former could be achieved. A change in immigration policy would certainly seem necessary, but the deportation of those already in America, many of them brought as children, is not the answer and seems inherently cruel and unfair.  A nationalistic movement is not unsurprising in times of economic hardship when the reigns on immigration seems to be held rather loosely. The two issues are inextricably linked. However, it would seem unwise for us to allow the decisions of one administration or one President to divide the people of one country. We are all, quite literally, in the same boat. Discuss immigration policies such as DACA with everyone around you, educate and debate. Raising wages and living standards for all working class people is necessary for prosperity and happiness. This is part of the solution, not outcasting and scapegoating those who share the same values and desires as you.

Over the last few years there has undoubtedly been a startling crackdown on freedom of speech across multiple mediums. One of the first points I can recall being personally irritated by this was in 2015 when Tyler, The Creator (A US rap artist) was banned from the UK for his supposedly offence lyrics and incendiary behaviour. As artists like Eminem in the past, he has been attacked by social justice warriors worldwide for his topics of choice which can include sexual assault and murder; as well as his frequent use of homophobic slurs such as ‘faggot’. All rational minded people can agree that in real life subjects such as rape and discrimination of sexuality are not funny. The issue is that some are seemingly unable to distinguish a difference between art and the real world. Strangely, discussion and exploration of taboo subjects is often accepted in film or in books; yet music, notably hip/hop, is not given the same licence and artists are often lambasted when others have their art hailed as edgy, even impressive. Interestingly, on his latest project ‘Flower Boy’ [Scum Fuck Flower Boy], Tyler hints that he himself may well be a homosexual or bisexual. This would make no difference to his right to explore certain subjects, but the stigma that has been attached to him has actually led some writers to claim that it is some sort of publicity stunt or ‘trolling’. I disagree and to be honest I think this exposes a huge hypocrisy in these same social justice warrior types as they question and scrutinise him; an act they would surely be quick to condemn if they were on the outside watching this take place between other parties. This ridiculous, contradictory and moral point-scoring attitude towards the speech and art of others is what makes much of modern society so ridiculous. Approaching this from a different angle, we can look at the extreme backlash that has been directed towards people like Jordan Peterson (A professor of psychology at the University of Toronto). He was not only prevented from speaking by misinformed protestors largely constituting of university students and self proclaimed liberals, but also had his Youtube and Google accounts temporarily suspended. All of this was a result of his refusal to personally partake in the use of over 70 different gender pronouns and his claims that recent legislation in America had gone too far in dictating speech. Misinformed and aggressive protesting is one thing, although it could be argued that the right to protest must also be protected. However, for huge global companies to censor and silence people for voicing alternate opinions is a very slippery slope and is potentially dangerous. All positive progress is born out of the sharing of ideas and reasonable discussion. I think that we must wary of this growing trend of people competing to see who is the most politically correct and therefore who holds the highest moral ground. The focus should not be on the specific words and terms that appear across all of our languages, but on the intent behind these words. Hate speech is not simply the use or absence of certain words, but in the message the speaker is trying to convey. Everybody speaks differently and as Richard Dawkins has pointed out, much of this lies in physical neurodiversity. This means that biologically, many many people are bound to use language differently and often these people attend Universities and other places which are increasingly clamping down on their freedom of speech. This itself is a form of discrimination and again shows the extreme hypocrisy that can be seen in the social justice warrior movement. All voices must be heard and we all must be reasonably thick skinned and sharp minded enough to recognise the difference between a disagreement in thought and outright hate.

In light of the currently shocking state of the American presidency and a recent history of extremely poor choice of political candidates in the UK, I think it is high time many people abandoned the ridiculous tribal approach to politics. The concept of 'Policies not people' is certainly something that sticks out to me, as the idea that you could support some policies deemed 'Left' or 'Red' and simultaneously support some that would be deemed 'Right' or 'Blue' is completely lost on some people. It is so unlikely that a leader would emerge whom you 100% agree with and I just do not understand why so many people feel the need to blindly defend their chosen candidate. At the same time, it seems to be that once someone has decided they dislike a candidate, they will condemn everything they do and/or simply ignore the good they do. There is no logic to this and I believe this trend occurs because many of us struggle to admit we are wrong and also have a hard time vocally expressing or even admitting to ourselves that our opinion has changed. A change in opinion or attitude does not render one weak or spineless, if we learn something new or revolutionary information is suddenly revealed to us; it is perfectly natural to have a shift in stance. In addition to this, the solutions to many problems rarely lie at the extreme end of the 'spectrum'. Often the truth and answers lie in the grey area, in the middle, or 'on the fence' as many would say in a scathing tone - it's perfectly fine to withold judgement if one does not have all the facts or is not totally convinced at that moment in time. Do not cave to the pressure to join a team, or a side; it will benefit all of us if there are more people willing to listen to the arguments from all sides and also to come up with new ideas. It is the responsibility of us all to allow every new idea to be heard fairly and for any idea to be open to criticism. At a time when ideas can be shared around the world in seconds, it would be foolish not to take advantage of this. It would be arrogant to assume that a smaller group of people can provide all of the answers and claim that everybody else is simply behind the times, naive or stupid.

Today's post has been inspired by my recent interest in the work of men like Graham Hancock and theories of lost human civlizations. It is widely accepted that the human race as we currently know it is at the pinnacle of it's progress and that our knowledge of the past has served all it's purpose in allowing us to stand on the shoulders of previous giants. What if we have missed something? Given the vast amount of time people have been around and the variety in communities around the world I don't think it is so outlandish to think that vital information or radically different world perspectives and ideologies could have been lost. Even if we are never to discover misplaced secrets of our past, sites like Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe indicate that people have been sophisticated and successful in ways unknown to us. These mysteries should be ample motivation for us to try and broaden our horizons as much as possible, to try and create ideas outside of the mainstream. It seems to me that the concepts of the political left and right, the limiting scope of Capitalism vs. Communism etc. could all essentially amount to the micro, and perhaps it is a change in the macro which could provide real change and significant advancement. Technology would probably be the main front runner as a provider of the next leap forward, as the race for AI and maybe even the creation of cyborgs and the merging of man and machine has colossal implications for mankind. In addition to this, the shift away from Victorian like values and the fear of psychadelic and spiritual experiences will open many doors that have been rammed shut for years at the hands of arrogant politicians and religious leaders. The libertarian movement and mass education of the populace will only accelerate and move forwards as we all look for satisfaction and meaning in an ever more monotonous consumerist and quite narcissistic society. This is where the need for us to be humble comes into play, we must accept that we are nowhere near our full potential as a species and we must be honest enough to admit that the direction we have taken in many ways could be the wrong way. Our arrogance will only blind and hinder us and to discover the real truths we should not only try to learn as much as we can about civilizations of the past but also take this as inspiration and motivation to conceive of an alternate future, even if it seems impossible from the position and course we are currently set on.

It can seem easy to get bogged down in the apparent abundance of negativity of life which we can discover on the news, on the internet and even in day to day living. I think it would be foolish to bury our heads in the sand and pretend not to see much of it, not only would this be extremely ignorant but also it makes it very difficult to come up with solutions to the problems that exist in our world. Furthermore, it is also insulting to the people certain issues effect, if we refuse to acknowledge the struggle they endure. With this in mind, it is necessary for news channels and media outlets to inform everyone about disasters and horrors across the globe because much of the time it will require an effort from a large amount of the world’s population to reach a solution. With a global population of over 7 billion people, it should not be surprising to us that many terrible things happen on a daily basis; as do so many wonderful things. A real issue for us is that often it is the negative things which are deemed important for us to know, as an atmosphere of austerity and fear is created by the powers that be. The scale at which this is done can be debated but I personally don’t buy into the idea of an illuminati or some other small secret society controlling everybody else. However, we can all see how powerful moguls have influence in a variety of areas and self education is a potent weapon against this. Discovering the truths of the world for ourselves is no easy task, as the misinformation out there is vast but a rejection of blind faith and a vigorous personal aspiration to be not be deceived sets us free from the lies and fearmongering. To be overwhelmed by the knowledge of wickedness in the world can be the easy option, to accept that things will always be how they are because it seems a herculean effort to make the smallest change. The burden to appreciate beauty and positives in the world rests on our own shoulders and in all of us lies the power to make real change in the world simply by rejecting the notion that we are merely a small cog that has no control over the system it is a part of. On top of this, if one was to decide that they can discover no more meaning in life than to enjoy it, we must be aware of the filtration and censorship of the information we receive. We must know that the world presented to us by the news, media and politicians comes through a specific lens. Imagine how differently we would all see the world if we lived a few minutes of the day in each corner of the world, from the perspective of a billionaire in the UAE to a starving child in Africa to a woman in Saudi Arabia to a British teenager at high school. Just imagine the variety in experience of a few hundred kids in any given school year, the highs and lows they experience could be so different day to day that to make a broad judgement on the experience of one child on a random day would be hugely inaccurate. If we apply this logic to the global populace, we can start to comprehend just how difficult it is for any of us to really understand the variety of the human experience. There database is enormous, so why are do we allow ourselves to be drawn towards and consumed by the negative? For me personally, watching something like a silly 2-minute video of a dog and an elephant that have become best friends can be a pleasant reminder of the sporadic and strange sources of happiness in the world which occur far more frequently than we would imagine in a time when we are constantly bombarded with horrific information about terrorist attacks and brutal political regimes. These things are undeniably important and effect many people but to let these examples of the worst cases of human nature dominate our view of the world is to allow ourselves to be deceived. Remember the things of beauty we experience on a daily basis, there is an endless supply of daily occurrences which pleasure can be found in, just because it may not be worthy of a front page headline and won’t pull in ratings for a news channel, does not mean we cannot enjoy it any less.